Post by Steeleface on Sept 6, 2016 13:40:23 GMT
Hey Everyone. This is an area that I'm interested in getting some feedback/advise/direction: how do you roleplay your stats?
I'm particularly interesting in how you roleplay characters with poor stats, like low WIS, CHR, DEX scores etc...
Part of what I love about RQG is that everyone roleplays their characters very well, using their strengths and weakness to affect the narrative in a way that reflects what the character would do rather than moving the player towards the best possible outcome for them or win the game as it were. I recognise this as a better way (or the way) to play a tabletop RPG – to treat it like a collaborative storytelling effort instead of a game that needs to be won. This is what sets RQG (in my opinion) well above the other roleplaying podcasts and shows that I’ve sought out. I’m developing a campaign now and I’m trying to coach my players in the best roleplaying habits because I think it will ultimately yield a more entertaining experience for everyone.
So does a low INT mean the character is dumb? How would you reconcile roleplaying a character with a low INT but a high WIS? Does that translate as a sort of “idiot savant”? What about the reciprocal, a high INT but a low WIS – would that a sort of “bookworm”, someone with education but no real world experience? Am I correct in thinking that Bertie has a decent INT but a low WIS?
I appreciate that the stats are somewhat open to interpretation – a low CHR could be played as someone being ugly OR socially awkward OR perhaps a bit of both. Sacha, for example – her low CHR plays out as a bit socially awkward.
Sorry if this is a bit rambling but ultimately I’m looking for opinions from those more experienced with the mechanics and roleplaying in general.
I'm particularly interesting in how you roleplay characters with poor stats, like low WIS, CHR, DEX scores etc...
Part of what I love about RQG is that everyone roleplays their characters very well, using their strengths and weakness to affect the narrative in a way that reflects what the character would do rather than moving the player towards the best possible outcome for them or win the game as it were. I recognise this as a better way (or the way) to play a tabletop RPG – to treat it like a collaborative storytelling effort instead of a game that needs to be won. This is what sets RQG (in my opinion) well above the other roleplaying podcasts and shows that I’ve sought out. I’m developing a campaign now and I’m trying to coach my players in the best roleplaying habits because I think it will ultimately yield a more entertaining experience for everyone.
So does a low INT mean the character is dumb? How would you reconcile roleplaying a character with a low INT but a high WIS? Does that translate as a sort of “idiot savant”? What about the reciprocal, a high INT but a low WIS – would that a sort of “bookworm”, someone with education but no real world experience? Am I correct in thinking that Bertie has a decent INT but a low WIS?
I appreciate that the stats are somewhat open to interpretation – a low CHR could be played as someone being ugly OR socially awkward OR perhaps a bit of both. Sacha, for example – her low CHR plays out as a bit socially awkward.
Sorry if this is a bit rambling but ultimately I’m looking for opinions from those more experienced with the mechanics and roleplaying in general.